Some countries have free trade agreements and are in the process of expanding them, while others have established common unions and markets. This development has a profound impact on small businesses around the world. In recent years, trade between East Asian countries has grown much faster than trade outside the region. With the development of several trade agreements – such as the Association of South Asian Nations (ASEAN), composed of Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei and Indonesia – the region is increasingly commercial. However, economic integration is mainly influenced by Japanese investment in the region, creating an informal trading bloc. Even considering the Asian financial crisis that began in 1997 and will undoubtedly have a significant impact on regional developments and global growth, many expect Asia to continue to become the dominant region of the world over the next decade. There are pros and cons of trade agreements. By removing tariffs, they reduce import prices and consumers benefit from them. However, some domestic industries are suffering. They cannot compete with countries with lower standards of living. This allows them to leave the store and make their employees suffer.
Trade agreements often require a trade-off between businesses and consumers. If these trade agreements disappeared (either by unilateral dissolution or by the introduction of a tax on imported goods), the impact on your supply chain for small businesses would likely focus on increasing the cost of goods. To offset these cost increases, you may need to: under the World Trade Organization, different types of agreements are concluded (most often in the case of new members), the terms of which apply to all WTO members on the most advantaged basis (MFN), meaning that the advantageous terms agreed bilaterally with a trading partner also apply to other WTO members. Trade agreements are generally unilateral, bilateral or multilateral. At that time, U.S. textile industry leaders, who were generally opposed to free trade, were ahead of NAFTA. Apart from the leaders of a few companies, the textile industry saw free trade with Mexico as opening up a large market for its business. The textile factory sector in Mexico was not well developed. As a result, Mexico represented a potential 25% increase for U.S.
textile producers. To allay fears of possible job losses in the United States, the boards of the American Textile Manufacturers Institute (ATMI) have promised that they will not relocate their jobs, factories or facilities to Mexico. Strong support from textile leaders for NAFTA has led some members of Congress in major textile-producing countries to vote in favor of the agreement. This helps increase U.S. exports to the rest of the world, where 95% of our potential customers live. Increased U.S. exports are driving up business turnover, boosting our economy and adding to the 38 million U.S. jobs currently dependent on trade. The failure of Doha has enabled China to reach a global level of trade. It has signed bilateral trade agreements with dozens of countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Chinese companies have the right to develop the country`s oil and other raw materials. In return, China provides loans and technical or commercial assistance.
However, some concerns have been expressed by the WTO. According to Pascal Lamy, Director-General of the WTO, the dissemination of regional trade agreements (RTA) is “… is the concern of inconsistency, confusion, exponentially increasing costs for businesses, unpredictability and even injustice in trade relations.  The WTO is how typical trade agreements (called preferential or regional agreements by the WTO) are to some extent useful, but it is much more advantageous to focus on global agreements within the framework